Legal Opinion

State v. Korsen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2003No. 28276PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This appeal by the State seeks review of a decision by a magistrate that held a provision of Idaho’s trespass statute, I.C. § 18-7008(8), unconstitutional because of vagueness. The magistrate’s decision was upheld on an intermediate appeal to the district court and, upon an alternative analysis, the district court further ruled that the statute in question was unconstitutional also on grounds of over-breadth. By cross-appeal, the respondent, David Korsen, contends that the district court erred in concluding that Korsen was not protected under double jeopardy principles…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. KornIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API