Legal Opinion

State v. Michael Jay Freitas

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 2014No. 41378PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELANSON, Judge.

Michael Jay Freitas appeals from the district court’s order, entered in its intermediate appellate capacity, affirming Freitas’s judgment of conviction for transferring water in violation of Spirit Lake City Ordinance 7-4-10. Freitas specifically alleges that the ordinance is unconstitutional and that the district court erred in affirming his judgment of conviction despite various asserted errors by the magistrate. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Freitas was cited for providing water to a neighbor’s residence in violation of Spirit Lake City…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Thomas C. KelleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. David John HarperIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. BundyIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. State v. Christopher T. DeanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. CookIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API