In Re Scarborough
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
This is the factual situation on which the parties relied to support their respective positions: Rotta died at a motel in Laurens, South Carolina. She was on a journey from her home in Michigan to Florida. She had never resided in North Carolina, and had no heirs or next of kin in this State. Domiciliary administration was in Michigan. Jack Long was appointed as Ancillary Administrator in South Caro*567lina. Scarborough asserts Rotta’s death was the result of Martin’s negligence. The asserted night of action, accruing because of Martin’s tort, is the only asset with a situs in this State.
Long,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Darrah v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Fann v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Flexible Foam Products, Inc. v. Vitafoam Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Carethers v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- McKenzie v. K. S. N. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- In Re ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964