Legal Opinion

Fann v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1911PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After stating the case: In this day and time and under our present system, it seems to be generally conceded that the decrees of probate courts, when acting within the scope of their powers, should be considered and dealt with as orders and decrees of courts of general jurisdiction, and where jurisdiction over the subject-matter of inquiry has been properly acquired that these orders and decrees are not as a rule subject to collateral attack. The facts very generally recognized as jurisdictional are stated, in Revisal 16, to be that there must be a decedent; that he died domiciled in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Shepard v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Springer v. . ShavenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Starnes v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Shepard v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. In Re Vilas' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Starnes v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Edwards v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API