Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Leet
California Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1944No. S. F. No. 16906; S. F. No. 16907PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Petitioner, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, appeals from two orders denying motions to set aside the appointment of Charlotte E. Leet as administratrix of the estate of Ivan R. Miller and of the estate of Frederick Albert Waits. These appeals have been consolidated because they involve substantially the same facts and the same legal question. The petitions for letters of administration were filed in the Superior Court of Alameda County on August 15, 1942. The petition in the Miller estate alleged that Ivan R. Miller was a resident of Albuquerque, New Mexico, where he died,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lindgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- American R. Co. of PR v. BirchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Price v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.