Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Interstate Fruit Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1924No. File No. 5247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This appeal grows out' of an award made by the Industrial Commission for the death of Clarence Stratton. The claimants, Herbert Stratton and Nettie Stratton, are the father and stepmother, respectively, of the decedent. The defendant, Interstate Fruit Company, is a corporation engaged in the business of selling and distributing fruit, soft drinks, etc., to the trade *454in the city of Sioux Falls. The decedent was employed by defendant as a truck driver to deliver such commodities to the various customers of defendant in said city. Defendant resists payment of the award on the ground, first, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Day v. Sioux Falls Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gacesa v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. McMahon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beem v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Pohler v. T. W. Snow Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Anderson v. Hotel CataractSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Tinsman Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API