Legal Opinion

Allen v. Bryant

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1909No. L.A. No. 2227PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is a second appeal in the above-entitled cause. The first was taken to the appellate court of the second appellate district, and the opinion of that court will be found in 4 Cal. App. 371, [88 Pac. 294]. Before the second trial defendants had filed a cross-complaint, which sought relief, charging upon the same matters of fraud that appeared in their answer. The cross-complaint does not materially modify or enlarge the issues joined under the complaint and answer. Appellants support their appeal upon two propositions: 1. The law of the cáse; and 2. The insufficiency of the evidence to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Wallace v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wixson v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Allen v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  3. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API