People v. Hall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Defendant was charged in count I of the information with grand theft, in count II with forgery and in count III with grand theft. He was found guilty on all three counts, judgment was pronounced against him on each, his motion for a new trial was denied and he appeals.
Defendant was a duly licensed collection agent, doing business at Pasadena, in Los Angeles County, California, and all the charges here made against him grow out of his activities in that capacity. John F. Pryor, a lawyer practicing his profession at Hanford, California, had obtained two judgments for Ms…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Trout v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Henry Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.