Multa Trina Ditch Co. v. Stobaugh
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
This is a writ of error to a decree of the district court rendered on a petition for a review of a former decree of the same court, in supplemental statutory proceedings for the adjudication of priorities of water rights. The original or general adjudication decree in that district, rendered in 1888, is not involved. The two principal errors assigned are: (1) The petition for the review is insufficient. (2) The findings and decree are not sustained by, but are against, the evidence.
If the first assignment is good, as we think it is, the second may be and is disregarded. The record is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Waterman v. HughesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Crippen-Lawrence Investment Co. v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Rio Grande Land & Canal Co. v. Prairie Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holbrook Irrigation District v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- In re RockwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- State v. StiffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Martinez v. San Luis Power & Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Cohen v. StinglWashington Supreme Court · 1958