Waterman v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County: Eon. M. S. Bailey, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
Under the provisions of our general statutes, which furnish a special procedure for the adjudication of rights to the use of water for irrigation, the district court of Fremont county in April, 1887, rendered a decree whereby it established such priorities in Water District No. 12. This determination, ■under our laws, is designated a decree, and it consists of separate and distinct clauses or adjudications, one for each of the ditches or canals in the water district to which a priority was awarded. Among other things, it adjudged that the several ditches should be numbered as nearly as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crippen v. X. Y. Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Water Supply & Storage Co. v. TenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Crawford Clipper Ditch Co. v. Needle Rock Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Masterson v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Multa Trina Ditch Co. v. StobaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.