Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2002No. Nos. 99-10411 to 99-10414, 99-10423 and 99-10425PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge.

Following a 17-week trial, Harry Johnson, Gene Buree, Michael Davis, Louise Clark, Micah Rudisill, and Larry Eames (“Defendants”) were found guilty of conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, mail fraud, and wire0 fraud for their involvement in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. Rudisill and Eames were also found guilty of money laundering. Each defendant appealed his or her conviction and sentence on multiple grounds, and the six appeals were consolidated into a single matter for consideration by this court. For the reasons set forth below, we…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. James Montgomery, United States of America v. Mary O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Aldo TaralloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. McENRYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API