Legal Opinion

United States v. James Montgomery, United States of America v. Mary O'COnnOr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2004No. 03-30269, 03-30275PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants James Montgomery and Mary Lou O’Connor were convicted by a jury of conspiring to commit mail fraud and committing mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1341. Montgomery challenges the district court’s denial of his claim that the marital privilege excludes evidence of his wife’s communications to him. Both defendants also challenge the indictment, the sufficiency of the evidence, the district court’s admission of a summary exhibit and their sentences.

I

In 1983, Montgomery and his wife, Louise Montgomery (“Mrs.Montgomery”), formed Sun Village Realty,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Rick K. VoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RizkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Robert Lee GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API