Legal Opinion

United States v. Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2008No. 07-50120, 07-50146PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Paul and William Peterson ran a home building business in California. In the 1990s, they subsidized down payments to home buyers and then submitted misleading gift letters to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) falsely stating that a family member or friend of the buyer had provided the money for the down payment.

Defendants appeal their jury convictions for: 1) causing false material statements to be made in a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; 2) aiding and abetting in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. HofusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. YeungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Timothy RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API