Legal Opinion
Houghton v. SIPCO, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1994No. 93-3551PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by eight former and present salaried employees of SIPCO, Inc., alleging that SIPCO and its sister company, Monfort, Inc. (collectively, “SIPCO”), violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”), by reducing plaintiffs’ compensation and retirement medical benefits and denying them severance pay. Following jury verdicts in plaintiffs’ favor, the district court entered judgment awarding damages and equitable relief. Concluding that the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- John Dibiase v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- William MULLIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Jerry O. Smith v. City of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Mary Jo Krauel v. Iowa Methodist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.