Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Tarbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1922No. 1952. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Griswold, a real estate broker, sued the appellee Tarbell February 7, 1919, to recover the sum of $3,000, alleged to be due him as commissions for procuring a purchaser for a certain oil lease. The cause was numbered 1473 on the docket of the district court of Wichita county. Thereafter, on February 10th, the appellant sued out a writ of garnishment against the National Bank of Commerce of Wichita Falls, alleging that said bank was indebted to Tarbell and had effects belonging to Tarbell in its hands. This cause was numbered 1474 on the docket of said court. Thereafter, on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hermann v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Cricket S. S. Co. v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. Moore v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wise & Jackson v. NottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Luse v. Fort Worth Electric & Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Taylor v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API