Legal Opinion

Osceola Mercantile Co. v. Nabors

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1920No. 6364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is a garnishment proceeding by appellant against appellees under the statute seeking to subject a certain fund deposited and in the possession of the First State Bank of Hillsboro, as garnishee, alleged to belong to H. C. Nabors, debtor in the original action and against A. M. and J. T. Frazier, sureties on the replevin bond filed by said Nabors. The material part of the garnishee's answer to the writ, necessary to notice, is:

"That in the contract and agreement in regard to the borrowing of said money, and as part of the contract, and as a condition on which said money was loaned to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seinsheimer v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Neely v. Grayson County National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Tinsley v. ArdreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Owens v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Davis v. McFallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. First Nat. Bank of LipanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Cook & Arrington v. Citizens' State Bank of MarlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Fairchild v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Bennett Printing Co. v. Dines Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Griswold v. TarbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API