Legal Opinion

United States v. Kozeny

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 13, 2009No. 05 Cr. 518(SAS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

After a five-week trial, defendant Frederic Bourke was convicted of conspiring to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. 1 He now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 for entry of a judgment of acquittal on both counts, or alternatively, pursuant to Rule 33 for a new trial. For the reasons that follow, his motions are denied.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Facts 2

SOCAR is the state-owned oil company of the Republic of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KozenyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. United States v. BourkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API