Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit by the Duplex Printing Press Company against Emil J. Deer-ing and others. Decree for defendants, and-complainant appeals. Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Michigan. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing printing presses at its factory in Battle Creek, Mich.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit by the Duplex Printing Press Company against Emil J. Deer-ing and others. Decree for defendants, and-complainant appeals. Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Michigan. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing printing presses at its factory in Battle Creek, Mich. It has always maintained the open shop policy, both in connection with its factory in Battle Creek and in supervising elsewhere the erection of its presses. When it is fully occupied, it…
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating tlie facts as above). I am unable to concur with my Associates in the conclusion at which they have arrived, and which will appear in the opinion of Judge HOUGH, which follows. I shall, however, state the facts involved and my opinion as to the law applicable to the facts as I understand them.
'¡'he complainant is a manufacturer of printing presses. It employs 250 machinists in its factories in Michigan, and some 50 additional employes as traveling salesmen and as expert machinists in supervising the work of installing the presses in the places of business of the various…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Loewe v. LawlorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Cinderella Theater Co. v. Sign Writers' Local Union No. 591District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
- Greenfield v. Central Labor CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Dail-Overland Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
- Donnelly Garment Co. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.