Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hurford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Rehearing of case in 11 Neb., 377, to which reference may be had for any further understanding of the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This case was before this court in 1881, and is reported in 11 Neb., 377. A rehearing was granted and the case again heard. The objections presented in the supplemental brief of the defendants will be considered in their order.

The first objection made by the defendants. is, that the plaintiff brought an action of ejectment for the premises in question, and on the trial offered no evidence of title, and purposely submitted to a verdict against him. This it is *15'claimed is sufficient to defeat a recovery in this action. The defendants claim to be the owners of the land. There is no pretense that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowman v. CockrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. RansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Miller v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pettit v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Wood v. HelmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska v. Village of WalthillDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  3. In re WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Adams v. OsgoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Vahlberg v. KeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API