Legal Opinion

Ivey v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett

Ivey was granted a writ of certiorari by a member of this Court for the purpose of reviewing the action of the trial judge in ordering that Ivey was not entitled to pretrial depositions nor was he entitled to inspect FBI reports which contained evidence which he expected the State to use in the trial of the case. Ivey was indicted for murder. Likewise accompanying and embodied in the same record is a record of Ivey’s petition for habeas corpus to he allowed bail, which petition was denied by the trial judge. To this denial complaint was likewise made.

All questions presented on the question of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. McGee v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Sadler v. LackeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Helton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Allen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flautt & Mann v. Council of City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Gooding v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  3. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. v. McAdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. S. L. W. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Vythoulkas v. Vanderbilt University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API