Legal Opinion

Vythoulkas v. Vanderbilt University Hospital

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 7, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOCH, Judge.

We granted this interlocutory appeal to consider an important question concerning the scope of pretrial discovery regarding expert witnesses. Specifically, we are called upon to determine whether a party, through the use of written interrogatories pursuant to Tenn.R.Civ.P. 33, may discover identifying information concerning an adversary’s formally retained expert when the expert is not expected to be called as witness at trial. After balancing the policy encouraging parties to seek expert advice with the policy favoring full pretrial disclosure of all relevant matters, we…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Bowman v. HenardTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. James G. Thomas, Jr., Brother and Next of Kin of Karen G. Thomas v. Elizabeth Oldfield, M.D.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Arnold v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Jones v. Professional Motorcycle Escort Service, L.L.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API