Legal Opinion

Torpey v. Murray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1904No. Nos. 14,195—(108)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Holt, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $167.50.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis to recover a balance of $160 claimed to be due the plaintiff from the defendants for finding a purchaser of certain lands from them. The allegations of the complaint are to the effect that the parties hereto entered into a contract whereby the defendants agreed to pay the plaintiff one dollar an acre if he would find a purchaser of any part of the lands they had for sale; that pursuant thereto he found a purchaser (Oliver Cochran) for three hundred twenty acres of the land, and introduced him to the defendants; that he purchased from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bollman v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  2. Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Paine v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Healey v. MannheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horbach v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Marshall v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Marshall v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  4. Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  5. Geo. Benz & Sons v. HassieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API