Legal Opinion

Healey v. Mannheimer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1898No. Nos. 11,225—(48)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The complaint alleged that on September 16, 1895, plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendants whereby it was agreed that plaintiff should work for defendants for the period of one year at the rate of $15 per week, and by virtue of the terms of said agreement she entered upon the performance of said work forthwith, and continued to perform said services until March 23, 1896, when the *241defendants discharged her from said employment without any cause, and would not permit her to perform services for the remainder of said year of hiring, although she was ready, able and willing to do so,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Torpey v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API