Stanton v. Hotchkiss
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in an action brought to quiet his title to a parcel of land in Fresno County, being, as described in the complaint, the northwest quarter of section 23, township 16 south, range 15 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian. The judgment was in favor of defendant, decreeing that defendant was the owner in fee of all of said land, and that plaintiff has no interest therein.
It was stipulated on the trial that plaintiff was the owner of said property, except in so far as his title thereto had been divested by certain purported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Harrington v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hinds v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Armstrong v. JarronIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Empire Mill Co. v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Warden v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Deets v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.