Legal Opinion

Warden v. Gries

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1932No. Docket No. 523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs and appellants brought an action against defendant and respondent to quiet title to certain property situated in the city of Los Angeles. The complaint was in the usual form of such actions. The respondent filed a second amended answer. The answer in substance denied the claims of appellants and claimed title in the respondent and others as devisees under the last will and testament of Nellie M. Wall, deceased, and respondent also filed a further separate and affirmative defense in which it was alleged, in addition to the matters in the answer, that the deed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gdowski v. GdowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hedendahl v. WinklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Nicholas v. FowlerArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Margraf v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API