Legal Opinion

Jaques v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1960No. Civ. No. 24274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment entered on a unanimous jury verdict in an action for damages for alleged false imprisonment.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant-respondent, the facts are these: Plaintiff’s husband, Elmo Jaques, conducted a back-yard machine shop in the garage of his home where he manufactured small wire brushes. The brushes were sold to defendant Firestone and used in the fuel cell division to clean the threads of bolt holes. Elmo Jaques was assisted in manufacturing the brushes by Frank Bowen, Robert Hatherst, and plaintiff. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Hogan v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Abrahamson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Abrams v. BendatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarke v. SullivanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. Houser v. FloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API