Abrams v. Bendat
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to establish a trust in real property and for money had and received. Defendant counterclaimed seeking money judgments against plaintiff. The matter was heard by the court sitting without a jury. From the judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor for $3,550.01 and declaring her to be the owner of certain real property, defendant appeals.
Mindful of the rule that in reviewing the evidence, this court must resolve all factual conflicts in favor of respondent, and all reasonable inferences must be indulged to sustain the judgment (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Miller v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Campbell v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Fernandez v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Jaques v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960