Legal Opinion

Houser v. Floyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1963No. Civ. 10579PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Plaintiff, a young married woman, was injured in a fall from a ski lift operated by defendants. Her negligence suit went to trial before a jury, which returned a defense verdict. She appeals from the ensuing judgment.

The ski lift consisted of moving overhead cables suspended from towers. Two-passenger chairs were suspended from these cables. The chairs faced forward as the cable transported them up the side of the hill or mountain. On either side of each chair was a movable safety bar which, in its lowered position, extended across the passenger’s lap. Beneath the chair was a footrest which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Greening v. General Air-Conditioning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Dillenbeck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Getas v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API