Legal Opinion

Montoya v. Mentor Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1996No. 16407PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Chief Judge.

1.Plaintiffs Abel and Joann Montoya appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment and dismissing their complaint alleging product liability claims against Defendant Mentor Corporation. The trial court ruled that the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, 21 U.S.C. Sections 360c-3601 (1994) (the MDA), preempted Plaintiffs’ causes of action. We disagree, reverse the trial court, and remand for trial.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2. This appeal arose as a result of injuries suffered by Plaintiff Abel Montoya and allegedly caused by a medical implant. In…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. State v. HerbstmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API