Legal Opinion

Best v. James

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 3, 2025No. 3:20-cv-00299Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION NATHAN BEST, ET AL. Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-299-RGJ STEPHEN C. JAMES, ET AL. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Nathan Best (“Best”), Matthew Chmielewski (“Chmielewski”), and Jay Hicks (“Hicks”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion to reconsider asserting new controlling precedent. [DE 141]. Defendants ISCO Industries, Inc. (“ISCO”), James Kirchdorfer, and Mark Kirchdorfer, (collectively “ISCO Defendants”) responded [DE 142], and Plaintiffs replied. [DE 143]. Defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API