Iusi v. Chase
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
A claimed agreement of real estate brokers for a “three-way split” of commissions has led to this tripartite litigation. Iusi, the listing broker, and Thompson, the middleman or broker’s broker, brought separate actions against defendant Chase, the procuring broker. The actions were consolidated and tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was entered in favor of Iusi against Chase for 50 per cent of the commission already paid to Chase, and declaring that half of the remaining commissions, as paid to Chase, should belong to Iusi. In Thompson’s action judgment was in favor of defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Associated Lathing & Plastering Co. v. Louis C. Dunn, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Medina v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Sanowicz v. BacalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Middelsteadt v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.