Isaias Alvarado v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We reverse the judgment below and remand to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The single question presented on this appeal is whether the Secretary’s decision that Mr. Alvarado was not “disabled” is supported by “substantial evidence.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1976); see Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). We have held that when no contradictory evidence is presented, a treating physician’s expert opinion is binding on the Secretary. See Bastien v. Califano, 572 F.2d 908, 912 (2d Cir.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Lionel J. Bastien v. Joseph P. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3Cited by34 opinions
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Joan M. Jones v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Frank Aubeuf v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Willie H. Hankerson v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.