Legal Opinion
Jaime De Anda v. City of Long Beach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1993No. 91-55839PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jaime De Anda appeals the district court’s adverse judgment in his civil rights action and its denial of his motion for a new trial. De Anda argues that the district court erred in (1) separating his trial into phases, (2) excluding evidence of the result of the state court preliminary hearing, and (3) limiting his examination of one of the defendants. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a new trial.
I
De Anda brought suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that defendants, the City of Long Beach, its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Larez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Davis v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Amato v. City of Saratoga SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Jordan Mark Sutkiewicz v. Monroe County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Slaven v. BP America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Patrick GALLAGHER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.