Legal Opinion
Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of Anaheim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2016No. 14-55644PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 24, 2016, and reported at 834 F.3d 1048, is hereby amended. The superseding amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Berzon and Owens voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Marbley so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has" requested a vote on whether to. rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
No further petitions…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Tracy Dunlap v. Liberty Natural ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- C. Gilmore v. C. LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Apple Inc. v. Wi-Lan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.