Delucia v. Kneeland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJohn Richards Booth, J.
The grounds of appeal in each of these actions were identical, the cases being argued together and so treated in this opinion.
The plaintiff’s intestate in each case was a passenger in an automobile driven by one Cianciola, which collided with a Mack truck belonging to the defendant resulting in the death of both passengers.
On cross-examination of Cianciola by defendant’s counsel, he was subjected to questions, the obvious purpose of which was to show some criminal proceeding against him as a result of the accident, all of which were excluded upon objection. Counsel for the defendant then said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Antel v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. BuxtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. MonahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Rogers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. SantelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Minacci v. LogudiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.