Legal Opinion
Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided July 21, 2003No. 07-01-0282-CVPublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Natural Gas Clearinghouse (NGC) appeals from a final judgment awarding damages to Midgard Energy Company, formerly Maxus Exploration Company (Maxus), for breach of contract. It argues, through 11 issues, that 1) it did not breach the contract, 2) the testimony of Maxus’ expert witness was inadmissible and constituted no evidence of damages, 3) a portion of the award includes “speculative damages” which could not be awarded, 4) the amount of prejudgment interest awarded was inaccurate, and 5) the amount of attorney’s fees awarded was inaccurate. We affirm the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Minco Oil & Gas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. Enterprises, Inc. v. Reece Supply Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- In the Interest of C.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Farlow v. Harris Methodist Fort Worth HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Calpine Producer Services v. Wiser Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.