Legal Opinion
Shetiwy v. Midland Credit Management
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 2013No. 12 Civ. 7068(SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs in this putative class action begin their Amended Complaint with the following statement:
*466 The purpose of this lawsuit is to correct the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process abuses that have occurred over many years in the State Courts throughout the United States Court systems by principals, the debt collection companies that the principals have sold the debt to and the attorneys who represent those entities. In the debt collection process the Defendants have made the court systems of this country appear as if…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Shetiwy v. Midland Credit ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Matter of People v. Northern Leasing Sys., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Fossil Group, Inc. v. Angel Seller LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Herrera v. Navient CorporationsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.