Reinhardt v. Life & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeog-deN, J.
The policy of insurance construed in Gilmore v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 632, 155 S. E., 566, contained a limitation to the effect that if the insured should die from Bright’s disease before the policy had been in force for two years that the liability of the insurer was limited to the return of premiums paid on the policy. Such limitation was approved by the court upon authority of Spruill v. Ins. Co., 120 N. C., 141, 27 S. E., 39. In addition the court ruled that the principle announced in Holbrook v. Ins. Co., 196 N. C., 333, 145 S. E., 609, did not apply to such reasonable limitations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Gilmore v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Holbrook v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- Potts v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Gray v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mills v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.