Legal Opinion

Horwath v. Roosevelt Hotel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1953No. Civ. 19320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Plaintiffs are certified public accountants and operate nationally as a copartnership. Mr. Loyd S. Pettegrew heads the firm in Los Angeles. In November of 1944, Mr. Pettegrew and Mr. Thomas E. Hull, president of defendant hotel company, had some consultations concerning an assessment proposed to be levied against defendant by the Bureau of Internal Revenue for additional income and excess profit taxes for the years 1940, 1941, 1942 and 1943.

As a result, plaintiffs were orally employed to resist the proposed assessment. A protest was prepared, and plaintiffs appeared and presented it to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. People v. LionbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Churchill v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Brown v. World ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Konjoyan v. Der ZakarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Burton v. Clough-Detty MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API