Legal Opinion

Akerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1924No. 23,763PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Stone, J.

Action for death by wrongful act wherein there was a verdict for plaintiff. The appeal is from the denial of defendant’s blended motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Respondent’s intestate, Andrew Leaf, then a vigorous man of 47 years, came to his death through injuries sustained about 4 o’clock a. m., December 30, 1916, at Grandy in Isanti county. Mr. Leaf was on his way to the depot, there to board the incoming train, and while attempting to cross the track in front of it received his fatal hurt.

Defendant’s main line runs through Grandy from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Des Moines Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Knudson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Wardner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Bauer v. Miller Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API