Legal Opinion
Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 3, 1998No. SC 15741PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BERDON, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether a home improvement contract entered into by the plaintiff, Wright Brothers Builders, Inc., and the defendants, Sandra O. Dowling and her husband, Joseph A. Dowling, complied with the Home Improvement Act (HIA), General Statutes § 20-418 et seq.
*220The plaintiff, a licensed home improvement contractor, instituted this action to foreclose a mechanic’s hen on property owned by Sandra Dowling.1 The plaintiff had filed the lien to secure payment for work that it performed on the residence of Sandra Dowling in accordance with a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. EhlersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.