Legal Opinion

Sprague Electric Co. v. Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 5, 1944No. Civil No. 364PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

The parties are in a wrangle over the taking of depositions. Plaintiff moves under Rule 30(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to hold in abeyance the taking of defendant’s depositions until plaintiff has completed the taking of its own depositions, and thereafter that defendant be directed to take the depositions of two of plaintiff’s officers at North Adams, Mass., where plaintiff has its main offices and records.

These are the circumstances. On April 5, 1944, plaintiff notified defendant that it would take the depositions of four…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. Fairwater Transp. Co. v. Chris-Craft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. Mitchell v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Fox v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  5. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb, Inc. v. Good Hope Industries, Inc. (In re Good Hope Industries, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API