Legal Opinion

Fairwater Transp. Co. v. Chris-Craft Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 12, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

There are two motions here disposed of:

1. Defendant moves under Rule 30(b), Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that the deposition of defendant corporation, by its president, etc., in accordance with the notice served by plaintiff be taken at Algonac, or Detroit, Mich., instead of 165 Broadway, New York, N. Y., as specified in the notice, upon the ground that the offices of the defendant are located at Algonac near Detroit and that plaintiff be required to advance reasonable expenses and counsel fees for an attornev for defendant to be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Moore v. George A. Hormel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Boiczuk v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  4. Moore v. George A. Hormel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  5. Sprague Electric Co. v. Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API