Fairwater Transp. Co. v. Chris-Craft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
There are two motions here disposed of:
1. Defendant moves under Rule 30(b), Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that the deposition of defendant corporation, by its president, etc., in accordance with the notice served by plaintiff be taken at Algonac, or Detroit, Mich., instead of 165 Broadway, New York, N. Y., as specified in the notice, upon the ground that the offices of the defendant are located at Algonac near Detroit and that plaintiff be required to advance reasonable expenses and counsel fees for an attornev for defendant to be…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Moore v. George A. Hormel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Boiczuk v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Moore v. George A. Hormel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Sprague Electric Co. v. Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944