Legal Opinion

In Re Dreyfus

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 12, 1933No. Patent Appeal 3157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

Dreyfus has appealed to this court that review may be here had of a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of an Examiner rejecting, for reasons to be hereinafter stated, six claims (being all the claims) of his application, serial No. 328,305, for patent, entitled, “Improvements in Manufacture of Artificial Filaments.”

Claims Nos. 1 and 6, respectively, are quoted as representative:

“1. Process for the production of filaments or threads of organic substitution derivatives of cellulose, comprising dry-spinning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Rohm v. Martin Dennis Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  3. In re FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Rohm v. Martin Dennis Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In Re SaundersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In re BergerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API