Legal Opinion
Rohm v. Martin Dennis Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 16, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Patent infringement suit by Otto Rohm and the Rohm & Haas Company against the Martin Dennis Company. Decree dismissing bill.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the above-stated cause charge the defendant company with the infringement of the first and second claims of patent No. 886,411, issued to Otto .Rohm, May 5, .1908. 'íhese claims are:
“1. The process for bating hides, which consists in treating the hides with an aqueous extract of the pancreas of animals, substantially as described.
“2. The process for bating bides, which consists in treating the hides with an aqueous pancreatic extract containing an ammonia salt, substantially as described.”
Both claims are for a “process for bating hides, which consists in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rohm v. Martin Dennis Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- In Re DreyfusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Southern Electro-Chemical Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1925