Legal Opinion

State v. Pitts

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1994No. CR-93-0490-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The trial court considered several factors, including defendant’s prior DUI misdemean- or convictions, as aggravating factors in sentencing defendant for an aggravated DUI under A.R.S. § 28-692.02. 1 2The court of appeals reversed, holding that defendant’s prior DUI convictions were necessarily included elements of the current offense of aggravated DUI and, thus, under the rationale of State v. Orduno, 159 Ariz. 564, 769 P.2d 1010 (1989), not eligible for consideration as aggravating factors under A.R.S. § 13-702(D)(13). State v. Pitts,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. State v. LaraArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. OrdunoArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CampaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. O'Hara v. Superior Ct. of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Callen v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API