Legal Opinion
State v. Aguilar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 19, 2008No. 2 CA-CR 2007-0126PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In several recent cases, this court has addressed the meaning and effect of A.R.S. § 13-107, the statute of limitations that applies to criminal actions. See State v. Gum, 214 Ariz. 397, 153 P.3d 418 (App.2007); Taylor v. Cruikshank, 214 Aiz. 40, 148 P.3d 84 (App.2006); State v. Jackson, 208 Ariz. 56, 90 P.3d 793 (App.2004). In this appeal by the state, we must once again determine whether a criminal prosecution is time-barred under § 13-107. The trial court ruled it was and, therefore, dismissed all charges against defendant/appellee Roberto Aguilar.
¶ 2 The…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Theodore Cook v. Jimmy Stegall, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Craig Michael StefanovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Miller v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.