Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Village of Chubbuck

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1960No. 8933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellants are referred to as the Railroads, and respondent, an incorporated village, as the Village.

Appellants Railroads (plaintiffs) instituted this action to void Ordinance No. 47 of the Village (defendant), enacted April 24, 1959, attempting annexation of certain railroad land to the corporate limits of the Village. This land constitutes approximately one mile, — 12.29 acres, — of the Railroads’ right of way, and a small parcel, — .49 acre, — of their “operating property” contiguous to the right of way, totaling 12.78 acres, described in the Railroads’ complaint and in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. O'BRYANT v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Potvin v. Village of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. FredericIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hillman v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oregon Shortline Railroad Co. v. City of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Finucane v. Village of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Batchelder v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hendricks v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. City of Grangeville v. HaskinIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API