Legal Opinion
Hillman v. City of Pocatello
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1953No. 7953PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
On July 5, 1947, the City Council of the City of Pocatello passed Ordinance No. 1060 which attempted to annex to the City the property involved herein. The ordinance recites that the land so attempted to be annexed lies adjacent and contiguous to the City, and that the action so taken by the Mayor and City Council was at the request of the owners of the land.
This action was brought by the owner of the land so attempted to he annexed to secure a decree that said Ordinance No. 1060 is void, and the real property described therein is not a part of, or within the corporate limits,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Forsythe v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Annexation to Borough of Camp HillCumberland County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1891
- Brady v. PlaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Denver v. CoulehanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Irving v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Your Food Stores, Inc. (NSL) v. Village of EspanolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Potvin v. Village of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Finucane v. Village of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Larkin v. BontatibusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.