Legal Opinion
United States v. Hill
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided September 15, 1994No. 94-03118-RVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
Pending is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, (doc. 12.)
I. BACKGROUND
In this case, Paul Jennings Hill is charged in the first three counts of a four-count indictment with intentionally injuring and interfering with three individuals who were and had been providing reproductive health services. By doing so, Hill is alleged to have violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (the “Act”), Title 18, United States Code, Section 248. Hill is additionally charged in Count IV with knowingly using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Greenhut v. HandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.